Challenges and Solutions for Provider References in FHIR Data
Healthcare Providers for developers - Flexpa Flexpa The challenges of
Flexpa is hosting a webinar to address the challenges of referencing providers in FHIR data.
Summary
Flexpa explains the problem of diverse provider reference formats (literal, logical, etc.) encountered during healthcare data interoperability. The article details how they built a robust normalization pipeline to resolve these inconsistencies.
Key Players
Details
This article addresses challenges faced when aggregating patient past medical history using FHIR data. Specifically, it highlights that referencing providers (doctors, hospitals) varies significantly across different data sources from payers. The post analyzes the variations in 'provider references' stemming from the flexibility of the FHIR specification. Three main types of reference issues are detailed: 1. **Literal (Relative) References**: The easiest type, pointing to another resource on the same server. 2. **Literal (Contained) References**: Where a resource is embedded within another, which can hinder searchability. 3. **Logical References**: Using identifiers like NPI. These also pose difficulties for referencing in different contexts. Drawing from experience integrating with over 200 FHIR API implementations, Flexpa describes the development of a 'normalization pipeline' designed to convert these diverse reference patterns into consistent and resolvable formats.
Technology Note
FHIR（Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources）は医療データ交換の国際標準。このエントリの関連技術: FHIR
Original content copyright by respective publishers